\nClub<\/strong><\/td>\nSep-16<\/strong><\/td>\nNov-13<\/strong><\/td>\nDifference<\/strong><\/td>\n%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| manutd<\/td>\n | 8,800,000<\/td>\n | 1,452,195<\/td>\n | 7,347,805<\/td>\n | 505.98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| arsenal<\/td>\n | 8,000,000<\/td>\n | 3,128,281<\/td>\n | 4,871,719<\/td>\n | 155.73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| chelseafc<\/td>\n | 7,300,000<\/td>\n | 3,067,047<\/td>\n | 4,232,953<\/td>\n | 138.01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| lfc<\/td>\n | 6,200,000<\/td>\n | 2,138,175<\/td>\n | 4,061,825<\/td>\n | 189.97%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| mancity<\/td>\n | 3,500,000<\/td>\n | 1,319,358<\/td>\n | 2,180,642<\/td>\n | 165.28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| spursofficial<\/td>\n | 1,600,000<\/td>\n | 705,940<\/td>\n | 894,060<\/td>\n | 126.65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| lcfc<\/td>\n | 836,100<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | 836,100<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| westhamutd<\/td>\n | 976,700<\/td>\n | 233,008<\/td>\n | 743,692<\/td>\n | 319.17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| everton<\/td>\n | 939,900<\/td>\n | 275,635<\/td>\n | 664,265<\/td>\n | 240.99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| southamptonfc<\/td>\n | 625,900<\/td>\n | 162,653<\/td>\n | 463,247<\/td>\n | 284.81%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| stokecity<\/td>\n | 593,700<\/td>\n | 151,756<\/td>\n | 441,944<\/td>\n | 291.22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| swansofficial<\/td>\n | 610,100<\/td>\n | 176,690<\/td>\n | 433,410<\/td>\n | 245.29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| sunderlandafc<\/td>\n | 582,300<\/td>\n | 180,514<\/td>\n | 401,786<\/td>\n | 222.58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| wba<\/td>\n | 503,000<\/td>\n | 107,534<\/td>\n | 395,466<\/td>\n | 367.76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| cpfc<\/td>\n | 422,700<\/td>\n | 70,609<\/td>\n | 352,091<\/td>\n | 498.65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| watfordfc<\/td>\n | 235,900<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | 235,900<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| hullcity<\/td>\n | 282,200<\/td>\n | 61,624<\/td>\n | 220,576<\/td>\n | 357.94%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| afcbournemouth<\/td>\n | 207,400<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | 207,400<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| burnleyofficial<\/td>\n | 185,100<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | 185,100<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| boro<\/td>\n | 158,900<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | 158,900<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Even though fierce rivals Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal have added an incredible 4+ million in the same time period, only Crystal Palace come close in terms of relative growth seeing +498.65% November 13 to September 16.<\/p>\n With transfer signings like Zlatan\u00a0Ibrahimovi\u0107 and Paul Pogba, it’s no surprise that United have stormed their way to the top of Twitter league tables. However, the real value of this huge growth isn’t just vanity metrics, but the sheer size of an alternate advertising platform that United now have. With an audience of over 8.8 million, the Red Devils have developed a social strategy that doesn’t just engage with looks to activate sponsor partnerships.<\/p>\n With branded sponsored content from the likes of Chevrolet and adidas, United have been able to leverage their growth to presumably command better sponsorship deals and generate a new revenue stream. Quite simply, 3 years ago – this wasn’t happening on a major scale.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n | | | | | |
![\"manunitedaddidas\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.digital-football.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/manunitedaddidas-1.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n